ECCM-98: Conference Programme

Invited Speakers

This page last updated on 24th February 1998.

This page will be updated as more information about the invited speakers and their talks becomes available.


There will be three invited speakers:

Erik Altmann

Erik Altmann is a post-doctoral researcher working with Wayne Gray at the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Studies at George Mason University, just outside of Washington, DC, USA.

Invited talk: Mechanisms and implications of pervasive episodic memory

An examination of real-world tasks suggests that people encode a vast amount of fine-grain episodic information automatically in long-term memory. I will discuss a computational cognitive model of one such task that involves a computer user remembering and finding previously-displayed information. Constraints on the model will be traced back to the task and data and to the cognitive architecture in which the model is implemented (Soar). With these constraints in place, implications will be drawn for HCI and psychology. These include perspectives on the cost of a cluttered interface, on the role of background knowledge in gaining access to ephemeral detail, and on episodic representations necessary to support simple reality monitoring.

Back to the list of invited speakers.


René Amalberti

René Amalberti is a research professor at IMASSA, the Institute of Aerospace Medicine of the French Department of Defence, where he is deputy head of the Department of Cognitive Sciences and Ergonomics. He researches into the user modelling aspects of aviation, including those concerning flight automation. He is also attached part-time to DGAC, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation of the French Ministry of Transport, where he leads the group on human factors. He chairs the European Human Factors steering group of the Joint Aviation Authorities to prepare future human factors regulations. He can be reached at: rene-a@imaginet.fr .

Invited talk: Why Operators' Cognitive Models are Hard to Incorporate into Design: The Case of Human Reliability Models

Operators' models, or equivalent end-user models, have became a standard prerequisite for most man-machine system design. Nowadays, the designer can chose among a great variety of models: behavioral models of performance, running competence models, and cognitive models are available in a large range of granularity from quasi-neuropsychological models of memory to framework models of dynamic cognition. However, despite -- or maybe because of -- that variety, modelling the operator is still an area of uncertainty within the industry, with multiple forms and meanings, and with a persistent feeling that these models, whereas they should be useful, are hard to incorporate into the design process.

This paper focuses on the development and use of cognitive models of human reliability for the design of complex systems, and tries to understand biases and limitations of their use within the industry. In that sense, the paper is more industry-oriented than research oriented. It is divided into three sections. The first section details the range of existing cognitive models of human reliability and proposes a classification of these models into four main categories: error production models, error detection and recovery models, systemic models, and integrated safety ecological models. The example of the Aviation Industry shows how difficult it has been in the recent past to incorporate the most advanced of these models into design, whereas the same Industry had long complained about the lack of availabilily of cognitive operators' models.

The second section tries to explain the reason for the relative failure. It shows the inter-dependency existing between the category of cognitive model, the safety paradigm, and the strategy for design. Severe drawbacks may occur each time a model is used with the wrong safety paradigm or the wrong strategy for design. It also shows that the more cognitively-based the model is, the less it is incorporated into design. The lack of education in psychology of designers, as well as the lack of a clear procedure for incorporating such models into design, are among the most important factors explaining this lack of success.

The third and last section points to new directions in cognitive modelling to improve the fit between operator modelling and design requirements.

Back to the list of invited speakers.


Marcel Just

Marcel Just researches and teaches in cognition and cognitive neuroscience in the Psychology Department at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.

Invited talk: Modeling Neural Function and High Level Cognition

Recent brain imaging findings suggest several new assumptions concerning the architectural properties of the neural systems that underlie high level cognition, such as language, comprehension, visual cognition, and problem solving. Some of these assumptions have to do with

  1. resource-constrained processing and task assignment
  2. dynamic configuration and resource recruitment
  3. functional embedding, self-similarity, and interaction among the components of the cognitive system
  4. a preference ordering for the types of processing that each cognitive component can perform (graded specialization)

The 4CAPS computational modeling system implements these assumptions, with the goal of accounting not only for processing times and error probabilities, but also for the amount of brain activation observed in each of the activated component neural systems. 4CAPS consists of several component processing modules, each of which is a parallel production system with some connectionist properties, and each of which is intended to correspond to the function of an underlying large-scale neural network. The component production systems are highly interactive with each other, operate in parallel, and have a task allocation regimen based on graded specialization and resource availability.

Back to the list of invited speakers.



Back to the entry page for conference programme information.